RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB vs Corsair CMK192GX4M12P3200C16 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB vs Corsair CMK192GX4M12P3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 14.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK192GX4M12P3200C16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Corsair CMK192GX4M12P3200C16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1810 2873

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns