RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

40 374

Around 89% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.6 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.8 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2209 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns