RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Nanya Technology NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 4GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Nanya Technology NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 42

Around 31% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.8 9.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 6.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Nanya Technology NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Nanya Technology NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2282 1396

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns