RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Corsair CMSX4GX4M1A2400C16 4GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Corsair CMSX4GX4M1A2400C16 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

51 139

Around 63% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

5 14.4

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMSX4GX4M1A2400C16 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Corsair CMSX4GX4M1A2400C16 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

855 1152

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns