Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3000C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3000C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3000C16 8GB

Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3000C16 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 16.5
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 13.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    27 left arrow 62
    Around -130% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 6400
    Around 3.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3000C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 27
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 16.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 13.1
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 3061
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons