RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

25 186

Around 87% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.1 3.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.6 2.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 536

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns