Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB
Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3200C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3200C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3200C16 8GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3200C16 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    20 left arrow 41
    Around -105% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    21 left arrow 13.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    17.5 left arrow 9.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB
Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3200C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    41 left arrow 20
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.9 left arrow 21.0
  • Write speed, GB/s
    9.7 left arrow 17.5
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2366 left arrow 3619
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons