RAM comparison Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Overall score

Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

18 119

Around 85% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

20.5 1.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

16.4 2.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB

Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3530 447

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns