RAM comparison Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB vs Neo Forza NMUD416E82-3600 16GB

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB vs Neo Forza NMUD416E82-3600 16GB

Overall score

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Reasons to consider
Neo Forza NMUD416E82-3600 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 39

Around -44% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.6 7.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

16.0 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Neo Forza NMUD416E82-3600 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1939 3909

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns