RAM comparison Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB vs Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 4GB

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB vs Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 4GB

Overall score

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

36 39

Around -8% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.8 7.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.8 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 9965662-016.A00G 16GB

Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1939 2497

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns