RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
en
Русский Русский English English Español Español Português Português Deutsch Deutsch Français Français Italiano Italiano Polski Polski 中文 中文 日本語 日本語
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB
UMAX Technology 16GB

Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB vs UMAX Technology 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB

Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
UMAX Technology 16GB

UMAX Technology 16GB

Differences Specifications Comments

Differences

Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB
Report a bug
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    42 left arrow 69
    Around 39% lower latency
UMAX Technology 16GB Reasons to consider
UMAX Technology 16GB
Report a bug
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.5 left arrow 12.8
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.66 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB
UMAX Technology 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    42 left arrow 69
  • Read speed, GB/s
    12.8 left arrow 14.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    8.3 left arrow 8.3
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2095 left arrow 1926

Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 4GB RAM comparisons

Kingston 9905402-664.A00LF 4GB
SK Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 4GB

UMAX Technology 16GB RAM comparisons

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Kingston 9905403-156.A00LF 2GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons