RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
en
Русский Русский English English Español Español Português Português Deutsch Deutsch Français Français Italiano Italiano Polski Polski 中文 中文 日本語 日本語
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB
Kllisre 8GB

Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB vs Kllisre 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB

Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kllisre 8GB

Kllisre 8GB

Differences Specifications Comments

Differences

Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB
Report a bug
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    27 left arrow 46
    Around 41% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    13.1 left arrow 11.7
    Average value in the tests
Kllisre 8GB Reasons to consider
Kllisre 8GB
Report a bug
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    8.6 left arrow 7.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB
Kllisre 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    27 left arrow 46
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.1 left arrow 11.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    7.7 left arrow 8.6
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2009 left arrow 2349

Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 4GB RAM comparisons

Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 4GB
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4GB

Kllisre 8GB RAM comparisons

Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
Kingston 9905471-002.A00LF 2GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons