RAM comparison Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 16GB

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 16GB

Overall score

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

20 11.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.4 8.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 10600

Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1620 3592

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns