RAM comparison Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.4 17.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.2 12.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3278 3310

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns