RAM comparison Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 16GB

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 16GB

Overall score

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 38

Around 37% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.8 13.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.0 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3524 2471

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns