RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
en
Русский Русский English English Español Español Português Português Deutsch Deutsch Français Français Italiano Italiano Polski Polski 中文 中文 日本語 日本語
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB

Mushkin 991586 2GB vs Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Mushkin 991586 2GB

Mushkin 991586 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB

Differences Specifications Comments

Differences

Mushkin 991586 2GB Reasons to consider
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Report a bug
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 72
    Around 64% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    7.9 left arrow 6.7
    Average value in the tests
Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB
Report a bug
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 10600
    Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 72
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.8 left arrow 13.8
  • Write speed, GB/s
    7.9 left arrow 6.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    10600 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2156 left arrow 1605

Mushkin 991586 2GB RAM comparisons

Mushkin 999015 4GB
Samsung M471A1K1KBB1-CRC 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.CAGP7.DFW0C 8GB RAM comparisons

Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 8GB
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons