RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL18-22-22 D4-3600 16GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL18-22-22 D4-3600 16GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL18-22-22 D4-3600 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

34 106

Around -212% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 5300

Around 3.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL18-22-22 D4-3600 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

no data 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 3606

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns