RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 16GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 16GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

34 106

Around -212% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.6 2,069.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 5300

Around 3.62 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 2576

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns