RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 4GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 48

Around -100% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.2 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Crucial Technology CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1601 1845

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns