RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB vs Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB vs Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

21 26

Around -24% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 13.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.5 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

16000 10600

Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-16000, 1.2V, TBD1 V, TBD2 V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz no data
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1932 3435

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns