RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4S24AM.M16FB 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4S24AM.M16FB 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4S24AM.M16FB 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 26

Around -8% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.8 13.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.3 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3010EC58E8F1333 2GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4S24AM.M16FB 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1932 3009

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns