RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

43 374

Around 89% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

11.4 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.7 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1823 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns