RAM comparison Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 186

Around 80% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.2 3.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.4 2.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2143 536

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns