RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Русский
English
Español
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Polski
中文
日本語
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB
SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB
Compare
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB vs SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB
Overall score
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB
Overall score
SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB
Differences
Specifications
Comments
Differences
Reasons to consider
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB
Report a bug
Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
22
71
Around 69% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s
17.7
15.5
Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s
12.7
8.9
Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
21300
19200
Around 1.11% higher bandwidth
Reasons to consider
SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB
SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB
Main characteristics
Memory type
DDR4
DDR4
Latency in PassMark, ns
22
71
Read speed, GB/s
17.7
15.5
Write speed, GB/s
12.7
8.9
Memory bandwidth, mbps
21300
19200
Other
Description
PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed
17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
3075
1986
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB RAM comparisons
Thermaltake Technology Co Ltd R019D408GX2-3200C16A 8GB
Micron Technology 18ASF2G72AZ-2G1A1 16GB
SK Hynix GKE160UD102408-2400 16GB RAM comparisons
Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-C8KJ9A 4GB
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
RAM 2
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
Latest comparisons
Kingston 9905471-002.A00LF 2GB
Hewlett-Packard 7EH99AA# 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB
Samsung M378A1G44BB0-CWE 8GB
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB
Corsair CM4B16G2L2666A18K2 16GB
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/8GX 8GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FH 16GB
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 2GB
Kingston 9965600-012.A01G 16GB
AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB
Kingston 9905701-008.A00G 16GB
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8G 8GB
Crucial Technology BLS8G4S240FSD.M16FAD 8GB
Kingston 9965516-112.A00LF 16GB
Kingston 99U5704-001.A00G 4GB
G Skill Intl F3-2800C12-8GTXDG 8GB
Avant Technology J642GU42J5213N1 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
SpecTek Incorporated 16G 2666 CL 19 16GB
SK Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2GB
Essencore Limited IM4AGU88N26-GIIHMB 16GB
A-DATA Technology AM2U16BC4P2-B05B 4GB
Corsair CMK16GX4M4B3866C18 4GB
SK Hynix HYMP164U64CP6-Y5 512MB
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB
Ramaxel Technology RMN1740HC48D8F667A 2GB
Avant Technology J644GU44J1293NF 32GB
Report a bug
×
Bug description
Source link