RAM comparison SK Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

SK Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Overall score

SK Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 42

Around -45% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 13.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.1 8.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

SK Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2152 2227

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns