RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Русский
English
Español
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Polski
中文
日本語
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB
Compare
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB
Overall score
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Overall score
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB
Differences
Specifications
Comments
Differences
Reasons to consider
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Report a bug
Faster reading speed, GB/s
5
15.3
Average value in the tests
Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB
Report a bug
Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
37
46
Around -24% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s
11.5
1,852.4
Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
21300
6400
Around 3.33 higher bandwidth
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB
Main characteristics
Memory type
DDR2
DDR4
Latency in PassMark, ns
46
37
Read speed, GB/s
5,535.6
15.3
Write speed, GB/s
1,852.4
11.5
Memory bandwidth, mbps
6400
21300
Other
Description
PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5
PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed
5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz
17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
858
2875
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB RAM comparisons
Kingmax Semiconductor KLDE88F-B8KU5 2GB
Apacer Technology GD2.0918CT.001 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB RAM comparisons
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8266.M16FRS 16GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
RAM 2
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
Latest comparisons
Samsung M378T5663QZ3-CF7 2GB
Corsair CMSX4GX4M1A2400C16 4GB
AMD AE34G1601U1 4GB
Samsung M391A1K43BB2-CTD 8GB
Apacer Technology 78.01G86.9H50C 1GB
Golden Empire CL17-17-17 D4-2400 16GB
Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GRR 8GB
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MH78H8H-2666 8GB
SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FE 4GB
Kingston 9965516-430.A00G 16GB
Micron Technology 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 8GB
Crucial Technology CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 8GB
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
Micron Technology 36ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 16GB
Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB
Kingston 9905712-034.A00G 16GB
Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IR2400D464L17/16G 16GB
A-DATA Technology AD73I1B1672EG 2GB
Apacer Technology D12.2324WT.001 8GB
Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GRR 8GB
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW1 8GB
Micron Technology 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 4GB
Report a bug
×
Bug description
Source link