RAM comparison Apacer Technology 78.C1GET.9K10C 8GB vs Corsair CMD32GX4M4B3200C16 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.C1GET.9K10C 8GB vs Corsair CMD32GX4M4B3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 78.C1GET.9K10C 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.C1GET.9K10C 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMD32GX4M4B3200C16 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.6 10.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.4 6.1

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 78.C1GET.9K10C 8GB

Corsair CMD32GX4M4B3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1899 3566

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns