RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 34

Around 21% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.7 15.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.9 10.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3576 2795

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns