Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    38 left arrow 39
    Around 3% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.4 left arrow 13.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    9.4 left arrow 8.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 10600
    Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    38 left arrow 39
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.9 left arrow 14.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    8.7 left arrow 9.4
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    10600 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 8 9 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • Timings / Clock speed
    7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2106 left arrow 1966
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons