RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Faster write speed, GB/s

13.2 12.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3310 3299

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns