RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 32

Around 3% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17 15.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.5 9.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3282 2810

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns