Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Differences

  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.13% higher bandwidth
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    28 left arrow 29
    Around -4% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    18.5 left arrow 16.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    15.5 left arrow 12.0
    Average value in the tests

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 28
  • Read speed, GB/s
    16.9 left arrow 18.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.0 left arrow 15.5
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2601 left arrow 3790
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons