RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs Kingston 9905625-098.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs Kingston 9905625-098.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.9 15.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.0 9.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9905625-098.A00G 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Kingston 9905625-098.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2601 2591

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns