RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs SK Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH 2GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs SK Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH 2GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 101

Around 71% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.9 14.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.0 7.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH 2GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

SK Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH 2GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2601 1313

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns