RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB vs Corsair CMD64GX4M8A2800C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB vs Corsair CMD64GX4M8A2800C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 12.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMD64GX4M8A2800C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FE 8GB

Corsair CMD64GX4M8A2800C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1810 2817

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns