Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 28
    Around 7% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    21.4 left arrow 17.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    16.0 left arrow 14.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 28
  • Read speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 21.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 16.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3705 left arrow 3739
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons