RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 29

Around -32% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.4 12.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.8 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2282 3205

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns