RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB vs Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB vs Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

44 103

Around 57% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.6 7.8

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.9 12.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 12800

Around 1.66 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2193 1520

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns