Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB
Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB vs Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 16GB

Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    24 left arrow 38
    Around 37% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    15.2 left arrow 14.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    13.1 left arrow 12.3
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 19200
    Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB
Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR5 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    24 left arrow 38
  • Read speed, GB/s
    14.4 left arrow 15.2
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.3 left arrow 13.1
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    no data / 2400 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3392 left arrow 2892
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons