RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 16GB vs Kingston 9905783-025.A01G 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 16GB vs Kingston 9905783-025.A01G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

33 37

Around 11% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9905783-025.A01G 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA266.C16FP 16GB

Kingston 9905783-025.A01G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2827 3395

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns