RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

51 119

Around 57% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

5 1.8

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

855 447

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns