RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

62 374

Around 83% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

4 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

2,378.6 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

861 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns