Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V2D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V2D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V2D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB

OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V2D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 15.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 12.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    39 left arrow 62
    Around -59% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 6400
    Around 4 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V2D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 39
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 15.1
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 12.6
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 3000
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons