RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200ME78HAF-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200ME78HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200ME78HAF-3200 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.4 13.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.5 8.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 10600

Around 2.42 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BA1339.C16F 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200ME78HAF-3200 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 8 9 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2251 2655

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns