RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.8 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.1 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 25
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 3046

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns