RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 25

Around -14% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 12.1

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 2646

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns