RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Essencore Limited 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Essencore Limited 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Essencore Limited 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 25

Around -4% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.4 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Essencore Limited 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 2972

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns