RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Kingston XN205T-MIE 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Kingston XN205T-MIE 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston XN205T-MIE 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.9 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.0 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 10600

Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Kingston XN205T-MIE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 3522

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns