RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.9 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.4 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 10600

Around 2.42 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 3184

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns