RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB vs Apacer Technology 76.B305G.D500B 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB vs Apacer Technology 76.B305G.D500B 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

41 101

Around 59% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.7 6.7

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 76.B305G.D500B 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Apacer Technology 76.B305G.D500B 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2366 1311

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns